Original Intent
This is my sermon text for October 7,
2018. The text for my message was from the Gospel of St. Mark, Mark 10:2-16, and the lesson from Genesis, 2:18-24. + pBRC
May
God’s Grace through the Good News of Jesus Christ be at the center of your
lives forever. AMEN.
I absolutely believe that the
lessons and stories that come from the Bible should not be painful or be used
to hurt people. They may cause pangs of guilt because of what we may have done
or left undone. But if they cause pain, I think we need to go back and really
examine the texts because I do not believe that God the creator; Jesus Christ,
our Savior; or our advocate, the Holy Spirit intended them to hurt us. I do
believe our predecessors in the history of the Church may have twisted God’s
word, whether accidentally or deliberately, to cause pain to people who hear
it.
To really examine a text means
to look at every word and every choice used to translate it. It is detailed
work, but rewarding because you can see a text in a whole new way.
In today’s Gospel lesson from
Mark, the Pharisees come to test Jesus, to see if he would say something they
could use against him. The topic they use is divorce.
When they ask Jesus what the
law allows, he turns the question back to them, asking what have they been
told. The Pharisees say a man can divorce a woman by detailing his reasons and
then dismissing her. Jesus responds saying this was established because you have
hardened your heart.
Jesus references part of our
first lesson from Genesis where man and woman were created, and God’s original
intent for their relationship was established.
Now Jesus speaks of marriage
being between a man and a woman because at that time and that place that was
the only form of marriage. His omission of marriage being between two people of
the same gender isn’t a prohibition of it, but not clouding one issue by
bringing another issue to bear.
In our lesson from Genesis, God
has created a human out of mud and breathed life into it. God sees it is lonely
because it has no partner. So God takes the human mud creature and makes two
creatures from it. By taking the side, not a rib, but the side from the
genderless, asexual human, God creates two entities, a man and a woman. If you
think I am indulging in 21st century liberal revisionism, this
description comes from both rabbinical scholars and early Church leaders dating
back into the 3rd century.
To these two newly created
creatures God says they will be partners and help one another. The Hebrew
actually says the woman will be in front of the man. The dismissiveness of
woman being a helping shows ignorance to what that term is to mean. A helper,
an ezer,
is not a sidekick. The term helper is most often used in the Hebrew Bible to
refer to God.
God split the original human
into two so they would seek out their completing half to be in relationship.
The man was to leave his family and cling to his wife. The verb translated as
cling is better understood as joins with or re-bonds.
The original intent of God was
for humanity to find a completing half to be their lifelong partner. This
relationship would not only be a union of two people, but of two families, an
arrangement to be entered into with much forethought and negotiation.
But because humanity will fall
short of any divine goal, the union of matrimony will fail in many
relationships. Hearts are hardened, and it is for the best that the bond be
broken.
But in the midst of the damage
of divorce, there must be a discussion of protection for the powerless who are
left behind. Jewish law allowed a
husband to dismiss and divorce his wife for whatever cause he felt to be just.
While adultery, a betrayal of trust, was supposed to be the only reason for a
marriage to be dissolved, the husband had all of the power.
In an instant, a woman could be
on her own. In this culture, women were second class members. They were to be
taken care of by their fathers until they were married, then by their husbands,
and finally by their oldest son if widowed. But upon being divorced, women were
on their own in a world that did not care for them. Divorce takes a union of
two halves that were brought together, and leaves a have and a have not.
After this, Jesus heads into a
home, and people wanted Jesus to bless their children. His disciples stopped
these families, even though Jesus said no one should hinder children coming to
him, or to faith in him, in the lesson we heard last week.
There
is no one more powerless in all of society, at any time and any place than is a
child. They are totally dependent upon parents, families, communities and
cultures to provide for them and protect them. They are the most vulnerable.
Because of their vulnerability, they are the most trusting. Jesus shows his care and blessing for the least of these.
Another lack in precision in
understanding the original intentions colors our understanding of Jesus’ words.
Jesus does not say that we have to receive the kingdom of God as
a child to partake in it, but rather that we have to receive the kingdom in the
way that a child receives it, or any gift.
Think of the joy children have when they
receive a gift, especially gifts given at special times such as birthdays and
Christmas. The joy of receiving what you haven’t earned, and to which you can’t
respond to in kind, is how God wants us to act when we realize the gift of
grace God has given us through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus
Christ. It is a gift given to the powerless out of love. It invites a response
of love to be share with others who are weak and marginalized.
God’s original intent was for
incomplete, broken people to come together, to work together, to love each
other, to take care of each other, not to get anything out of it other than the
satisfaction of helping someone. We are invited to seek out, to help out people
out of a sense of justice, mercy, inclusion and compassion - out of love.
God’s original intent was for us to
cling and connect to each other, to live lives of love. When that would fail or
fall short, God’s will is for us to reach out to those pushed or thrown away,
and to welcome them into our lives and into our homes.
God’s original intent was for humanity
to reunite in a replication of the relationship that exists within the Triune
God. Knowing we would not be able to do that all of the times, God sent the Son
to show us what a life lived in sacrificial, self-giving love looks like, and
calls us to do as Christ did, to love as he lived and to live in his love.
Failure of any sort is painful. A
failure that fractures families is infinitely more painful. But we are called
to surround all of those in love and to protect the vulnerable, showing them
the value they have as children of God, and to bless and love them as Christ
does. AMEN.
Comments